when studying the brains of our fossil relatives, why do we rely on indirect evidence (cranial capacity) instead of direct evidence (brain tissue)?

Sagot :

This is true that we rely on indirect evidence (cranial capacity) rather than direct evidence when studying the brains of our fossil relatives.

Cranial capacity is the book of the interior of the skull of vertebrates that possess a skull and a mind (1). Cranial capacity is used to approximate the capacity of the intellect, which is still dirty from the data of the animal (1). Cranial capacity is often proven by the contents of the cranial crater accompanying cup beads and weighing their capacity, or by CT scan image.

Fossils are the maintained debris of plants and animals whose bulks were engrossed in sediments, to a degree soil and mud, under old seas, reservoirs, and waterways. Fossils further involve any continued trace of history namely usually in addition to 10 000 years traditional.

To know more about Cranial capacity refer to: https://brainly.com/question/8288333

#SPJ4