Sagot :
The correct answer is A) Noise pollution is another negative consequence riding against the use of wind turbines.
What is evidence?
Any fact that a writer includes in a text to bolster their thoughts and ideas is considered evidence. A few instances of evidence are:
Personal anecdotes
Statistics
Examples
Results from scientific studies
Opinions by experts
The author asserts that wind energy produce a lot of noise pollution in the language that is under analysis here. He brings up the claim that wind energy produce a lot of noise pollution to bolster his claim. He is thus supporting his claim with the advice of professionals.
So according to the evidence does the author provided to support the claim that wind energy is unreliable because noise pollution is another negative consequence riding against the use of wind turbines.
We can select option A as the right response in light of the aforementioned information.
Learn more about evidence
brainly.com/question/1455721
#SPJ4
Correct Question
What evidence does the author provide to support the claim that wind energy is unreliable?
A) Noise pollution is another negative consequence riding against the use of wind turbines
B) During hurricanes and storms, damaged wind turbines pose a great danger to humans.
C) These scientists also believe that wind strength is unpredictable and wind energy can only be suitable to particular areas where the wind blows well.
D) Wind turbines placed in remote areas will be a major threat to birds and animals as well.
E) People who live close to a wind turbine often complain about the noise emanating from it.