Charity is better than social security as a means of helping the genuinely disadvantaged. True or false?.

Sagot :

Charities, without a doubt!

There is no benchmarking, no public budget that can be viewed, no one volunteering their time, the average salary of a government employee is over $100,000 plus benefits, and there are no reports that social programmes actually assist people in escaping difficult circumstances when they are supported by the government.

In fact, they will adamantly state that the crises in child care services, homelessness, unemployment, poverty, and addiction are all getting worse. Less than 8 cents of every dollar of taxable income actually reaches the individual, if you do the math on just the unemployment claims and what the government spends on each individual.

With charities, there are many volunteers, a budget that everyone can view, and an average worker pay of less than $35,000

To learn more , refer;

https://brainly.com/question/18439537

#SPJ9