a
2. Short-response prompt (15 points)
Read the following excerpt from the article "What a Bad Flu Season Could Cost
the US Economy":
Tallying the total cost of flu is difficult. In a 2007 article published
in the journal Vaccine, CDC researchers put the total economic
burden at $87 billion annually, in 2003 dollars, counting a
statistical measure that puts a dollar value on lost life. Among
the costs: 3.1 million days patients spend in hospitals, 10 times
as many doctors visits, and 44 million days of missed work. Thb
estimates come with a high level of uncertainty, though:
Researchers calculated the total cost in a range from $47 billion
to $150 billion a year. The CDC is updating these numbers, but
there's no telling when they'll be ready.
Based on the cues you can see in the excerpt (that is, without doing further
research), how would you rate the credibility of the passage? Write a short argument
stating whether or not the information seems credible and objective. You are writing
an argument, so be sure to include a thesis statement and at least one counter
argument. Use specific details from the passage to support your answer.


A 2 Shortresponse Prompt 15 Points Read The Following Excerpt From The Article What A Bad Flu Season Could Cost The US Economy Tallying The Total Cost Of Flu Is class=

Sagot :

Based on the information given, and the sources the information is derived from, one can argue that the statement is credible and objective.

Why is this statement on the burden of the flu credible?

Scientific information is considered to be credible when it is published by peer-reviewed journals and by reputable scientific authorities.

The CDC is a reputable authority because it deals with diseases across the world and the journal, Vaccine, is a peer-reviewed journal. Information given by these two sources can therefore be considered credible.

Find out more on source credibility at https://brainly.com/question/1279931.

#SPJ1