David is drafting an essay about college hockey rivalries for a hockey-themed blog: Three years ago, the Boston University Terriers played the North Dakota Fighting Hawks in the NCAA tournament. The game went into overtime, and North Dakota appeared to score a goal for the win. However, after a lengthy review, the goal was called off because the referees determined that North Dakota was offsides. Boston University went on to win the game. To this day, North Dakota fans remain angry about this ending, arguing that the referees were wrong to call off the goal, even though it's obvious that it was the right call. This game has fueled an intense rivalry between the two schools. Rhetorical awareness can help David identify which of the following potential effects of his writing? a.) Alienation of the game officials who reviewed the goal b.) Alienation of any Boston University fans in his audience c.) Alienation of any North Dakota fans in his audience d.) Alienation of college football fans who don't watch hockey