Sagot :
1. The idea that "justice and avarice never dwell in one house" is stated explicitly in the text- the idea that there is never a balance, you can never have one and the other.
2. From this text, the reader can infer that the farmer is avaricious, since the horse was obviously not treated justly and they made the claim that the farmer is not just AND avaricious. The farmer got rid of the horse because they no longer served a purpose.
3. b) theme and b) not stated directly
Hope this helps!
1. The idea that can be gotten here is the fact that things can be forgotten or become useless to us when they can no longer fulfill their purpose.
2. The inference that can be made about the master is that he is an unfair and cruel person.
3. The theme is different from the main events in a story because it is not stated directly.
The Idea of the story
The idea of the story is that everything has a purpose and the horse has stopped meeting with its purpose so the farmer had to do away with it.
The inference that can be made
The inference about the master is that he is cruel and not one to consider a person's past good deeds.
Read more on the theme of a story here:
https://brainly.com/question/4008478