Oscar owns a bulldog. Another dog owner filed a lawsuit against Oscar alleging that his bulldog injured her pet poodle in a dog park fight. Despite evidence that his bulldog was not present at the dog park when a dogfight broke out, the jury found Oscar liable for injuries caused to the poodle. Based on these facts, Oscar has the legal option to do which of the following?
1) Make a peremptory challenge ((has to do with a juror))
2) File a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict
3) Motion that the court nullify the verdict based on res judicata(no this has to do with not refiling the case)
4) File a motion for a directed verdict at the end of trial testimony before the case goes to the jury that argues that no reasonable jury could find for opposing party and therefore the judge should make a ruling on the case accordingly